Anonymity currently remains conflicted in the early life of employment tribunals especially in relation to more delicate circumstances, such as sexual harassment in the workplace. Although when it does not involve criminal proceedings, anonymity is used to protect the reputation of all parties.

In some circumstances, employers facing an employment tribunal can claim for an anonymity order to protect their organisation. However, they must give valid reasoning for waving their right to anonymity and avoiding open justice.

Facing an employment tribunal claim can be problematic for employers, due to the negative press they may receive as a result, which may impact the organisations reputation, which is why applying for anonymity may be something to consider.

In an effort to improve internet regulations, the government’s Home Office and the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) are currently drafting legislation in order to regulate “social harms” online.

The proposed regulator has been labelled as the internet equivalent to Ofcom – the regulator of broadcasting, telecommunications and postal infrastructures. As similar to Ofcom, the regulation intends to include a mandatory code of practice for social media and websites. The Home Secretary, Sajid Javid and Culture Secretary, Jeremy Wright, are currently considering the terms of the Code of Practice. The terms are set to include age verification on social media sites, as well as a rule enforcing all sites to remove any harmful content within a specific time frame or instead face fines.

The Head of Ofcom, Sharon White, recently announced a call to action regarding the regulation of tech companies: